Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6398 13
Original file (NR6398 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD BLDG 12, SUITE 1001

ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

JRE
Docket No. 6398-13
December i7, 20

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.

A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 12 December 2013. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

You enlisted in the Navy on 1 September 1971You received
nonjudicial punishment on four occasions and were convicted by
civil authorities of driving while intoxicated, hit and run, and
leaving the scene of an accident. On 14 January 1974 you
voluntarily requested that you be discharged for the convenience
of the government with a general discharge. Your request was
pursuant to an expeditious discharge program which provided for
the early separation of Sailors who were likely to be discharged
under other than honorable conditions if retained on active duty
As you were not recommended for reenlistment due to your poor
performance and extensive disciplinary record, you were assigned

Printed on & Recycled Paper
a reentry code of RE-4.

The Board did not accept your unsubstantiated contention to the
effect that you were forced to request discharge for the
convenience of the government. As you have not demonstrated that
you were suitable for further service, and that your commanding

officer should have recommended that you be permitted to
reenlist, the Board was unable to recommend favorable action on

your request. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN P
Executive Director

Ss

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03822-08

    Original file (03822-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 January 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Regulations direct assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to members who are not recommended for retention or are discharged because of alcohol...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02736-09

    Original file (02736-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 January 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06638-09

    Original file (06638-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2010. Documentary Material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07614-10

    Original file (07614-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 May 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06986-07

    Original file (06986-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 25 February 1986, you enlisted in the Navy at age 18. On 30 October 1987, you acknowledged by a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04638-01

    Original file (04638-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. As a result of this diagnosis, you were recommended for an administrative separation\ ‘\ On 17 September 1997 you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of convenience of the government due to the diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08809-07

    Original file (08809-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 27 February 2002, you enlisted in the Navy at age 24. On 31 January 2003, you were honorably...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 11272 12

    Original file (11272 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 November 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, you were assigned the most favorable reentry code based on your circumstances.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04817-09

    Original file (04817-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 April 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05517-07

    Original file (05517-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Although your last performance evaluation indicated that you were recommended for retention, the Board found that recommendation was not binding due to you being found unfit for sea duty because of the severity of your diagnosed food allergy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...